coloring problem
mono trio: three collinear points spaced out by distance 1, all with the same color (wrt some coloring)
A cool question: Fix \(t\in [5]\). - can you color \(\mathbb{R}^2\) with \(t\) colors and avoid mono trios?
Turns out: There is a \(3\) coloring based on a plane tiling with hexagons + do weird stuff to the boundaries (appropriately assign them) that avoids mono trios!
A special class of colorings: “circly” colorings: all points at a fixed distance from the origin have the same color.
Question: is there some nice color reduction thing that you can do in higher dimensions?
Anyways, let’s think about circly colorings a bit.
It turns out we get the following formulas:
If you have a circle of radius \(r\), then the following two other circles must have different colors: - \[r\mapsto \sqrt{r^{2}+2}\] - \[r\mapsto \sqrt{r^{2}-1}\] (note that your circle must have \(r\ge 1\) to apply this rule)
If you have circles of radii \(a,b\) of the same color, then we find a circle of this radius that must have a different color: - \[a,b \mapsto \sqrt{\frac{a^{2}+b^{2}}{2} - 1}\] - \[a,b \mapsto \sqrt{2b^{2}-a^{2}- 1}\]
Using these rules with the seed that \(0,1\) are different colors, it’s pretty easy to show that any circly two coloring of \(\mathbb{R}^2\) has a mono trio.
Ok, but three colors? This is tricky. You could try to make an algorithm that - repeatedly applies these rules - by doing so you generate some graph - then you need to check if that graph is \(3\)-colorable - if the graph ever ends up having chromatic number at least \(4\) then we have found out that it is impossible to avoid mono trio in a \(3\) coloring - in fact, this would kind of work generally. we just converted this into a graph problem from a geometry problem.
caveat! you can’t just start from a single seed, e.g., the origin, and generate everything
because many irrational things live in different universes that you would never explore within your tame square-roots of finite binary decimal universe.
so you must branch all the universes.
oops its too much. will probably explode your computer. unless quantum.
question: does this algorithm terminate in <5 minutes?
3 coloring
But now, maybe a question you could ask is “what graphs are 3-colorable.”
well, here’s an easier question: In an Erdos-Renyi graph with parameter \(p\) what is the probability that it is \(K_4\) free? Or really, what value of \(p\) makes this probability constant?
Expected number of \(K_4\)’s is a good indicator, especially because variance is likely quite small. And the expected number is \(\Theta(p^{6} n^{4})\). So this would be \(p=\frac{1}{n^{\frac{2}{3}}}\) to get \(\Theta(1)\) probability probably probabbly of \(K_4\) or no \(K_4\). probably didnt actually calculate variance plz forgive.
But now back to some harder questions.
question: if \(p=100/n\) then how likely is it to be \(3\)-colorable? Maybe feels good because it is locally looking like trees?
question: what is relationship between max-degree and chromatic number?
observation: the \(p=\frac{100}{n}\) dude has \(O(1)\) triangles in expectation.
question: does this help us with \(3\)-coloring-ness?
question: is there a relationship between average degree and chromatic number?
question: what if instead you were looking for trios where you didn’t enforce colinearity? or you enforced some other geometrical condition?